2025 Dowa Marriage: Top Ten Classic Cases - Marriage Section | Covers Huawei equity division, marital property protection, property transfer, custody, and other core issues, safeguarding the property

Dao Hua Marriage and Family Law Firm

Marriage and Family Dispute Mediation/Litigation Practical Expert

Ten years of focus on; marriage and family legal services for bulk property mattersGuangdong Dao Hua Law Firm, Tang Yunhong Attorney, Dao Hua Marriage and Family Law Team, Shenzhen's renowned divorce litigation attorney, professional inheritance and succession dispute attorney, Guangdong and Shenzhen's top ten marriage and family law firms, specializing in handling: major and difficult divorce mediation/court litigation, property and small property division, will and inheritance disputes, will notarization, divorce property division, post-divorce property disputes, divorce/marital agreement, custody disputes, will inheritance disputes, statutory inheritance disputes, land and property inheritance, rural house demolition inheritance, will drafting, will validity determination, and other non-litigation and dispute matters. Service areas: Futian, Nanshan, Luohu, Longgang, Bao'an, Longhua, Guangming, Pingshan, Dapeng, Yantian.

Introduction:Marriage and family disputes are fraught with many legal risks, especially those faced by high-net-worth families in Shenzhen.Division of substantial property, validity of marital property agreement, recovery of extramarital gift, division of premarital and post-marital housing, division of shares in large factories, determination of joint debt of the couple, transfer of property after divorce judgment, and dispute over custody of children.Difficulties such as these urgently require the precise resolution of a professional marriage and family law attorney.Dao Hua Marriage and Family Law FirmAs a local deep-rooted in ShenzhenMarriage and family legal services, divorce dispute representation, joint property protection for couplesOur senior team, specializing in difficult and complex marriage and family law cases for many years, focuses onMediation as the main approach, litigation as a supplementary methodof law enforcement models, deeply cultivating core areas such as the protection of marital property, the litigation of extramarital affair rights, and the enforcement of divorce property, accumulating a vast amount of successful litigation experience. In the 2025 fiscal year, the team focused on various high-incidence legal pain points in marriage and family matters, handled a large number of typical cases involving substantial assets, custody disputes, and property enforcement, and fully protected the legitimate rights and interests of the parties. In order to review the law enforcement thinking, provide practical references, and assist similar parties in their rights protection, the Daohua Marriage and Family Law Firm team carefully selectedTop 10 classic marriage cases of 2025Thoroughly analyze the key points of the case, investigation techniques, and successful outcomes, fully showcasing the core strength of the Shenzhen professional divorce lawyer team.One, what is the role of a marital property agreement, and how can it be legally and effectively valid?

(1) Basic Case Situation
The principal has been married to her husband for nearly 20 years, has a 15-year-old legitimate son, and has a substantial family fortune, including a mine, several limited liability companies, more than a dozen properties, significant foreign investments, and nearly ten million yuan in cash deposits. In March 2025, the principal unexpectedly discovered that her husband had an affair outside of marriage and had fathered a child with a third party. The principal is worried that her husband will later favor the third party and the illegitimate child with the couple's joint property, seriously infringing upon her and her legitimate son's legitimate property rights and interests. Introduced by a friend, the principal learned that the Marriage and Family Law Team at Guangdong Dao Hua Law Firm specializes in major property-related marriage and family disputes, and then found Chief Lawyer Tang Yunhong to consult and handle matters related to property protection.
Core keywords:Marital Property Agreement, Major Asset Protection, Extramarital Affair Property Risks, Will Complement, Shenzhen Marital and Family LawyerChapter II: Focus of the Dispute
1. What is the core role of a marital property agreement, and can it effectively prevent the risk of property transfer by a spouse, safeguarding one's own and the legitimate offspring's property rights?

2. What conditions must be met for the signing of a marital property agreement to have legal effect, ensuring that the agreement can be performed and enforced.
Chapter 3: Case Outcome
The Tang Yunhong legal team, combining the client's current family property status and core demands, first thoroughly explained the legal role, conditions for effectiveness, and practical points of the marital property agreement to the client, clarifying that the agreement needs to be used in conjunction with a will to maximize the protection of property rights. Subsequently, the legal team, based on the detailed family property information, accurately drafted the "Marital Property Agreement" and "Will," specifying the ownership of joint marital property and the inheritance share of the legitimate child, avoiding the risk of property transfer, and guided the client through the simulation of the agreement signing process, standardizing the signing details. Ultimately, the team assisted the client in successfully signing a legally valid "Marital Property Agreement" and "Will," providing comprehensive protection for the client and their legitimate child's legal property rights.
Four, reasons for selection
This case focuses on the protection of marital property in families with substantial wealth, providing a combined protection plan of marital property agreements and wills to address the risk of property transfer triggered by extramarital affairs, and precisely resolves the core concerns of the client. The legal team not only clearly interprets the legal points of the marital property agreement but also, in combination with the complexity of large amounts of property, formulates a feasible and executable agreement text, controls the entire signing process, and ensures the legality and effectiveness of the agreement. This case reflects the team's professional advantage in disputes over marital property in families with substantial wealth, providing a professional model for the protection of marital property in similar high-net-worth families.
How is pre-marital property divided? How is the equity of Huawei Corporation divided in a divorce? How is child custody determined?

One, Basic Case Situation
In 2011, the principal and her husband registered their marriage. After marriage, their feelings were still good, and they had one legitimate daughter. Later, due to frequent disputes over trivial matters of life, the couple's feelings gradually deteriorated, and the principal decided to divorce but hoped to avoid intense conflict and dissolve the marriage relationship in a peaceful manner. Recommended by a friend, the principal learned about Tang Yunhong, the chief lawyer of the Marriage and Family Law Team at Guangdong Dao Hua Law Firm, who has focused on major property-related marriage and family disputes for over a decade. Tang is known for a style that combines firmness and gentleness and is skilled in a "mediation-first, litigation-assisted" approach to handling cases. Therefore, the principal entrusted Tang Yunhong, the lawyer, to represent her in the divorce case, with the core demand being a reasonable division of property and the pursuit of custody of the legitimate daughter.
Core keywords:Major property divorce disputes, Shenzhen divorce lawyer, pre-marital property division, large factory equity division, child custody rightsTwo, focal points of the dispute
1. The property purchased by the male party before marriage, whether there is an increase in value, joint repayment of loans, and how to legally divide it;

2. Whether the equity held by the male party in Huawei Company belongs to personal property or joint property of the couple, and how to reasonably divide it during divorce;

3. The custody of the legitimate daughter, how to legally determine it based on the parenting abilities of both parties and the child's wishes.
Chapter 3: Case Outcome
After Tang Yunhong lawyer and the special investigation team took over, they fully respected the client's request for "peaceful divorce" and adopted a "mediation as the main approach, litigation as the auxiliary" strategy. They first sorted out the details of both parties' properties, focused on analyzing the appreciation of pre-marital housing, the joint repayment of loans, and the ownership and division rules of Huawei shares. At the same time, they combined both parties' child-rearing abilities, the children's living habits and wishes, to formulate a reasonable mediation plan. After several rounds of communication and mediation, both parties reached a consensus, peacefully dissolved the marital relationship, and the woman successfully obtained a reasonable share of the man's pre-marital property, gained custody of the legitimate daughter, and fully achieved the core demands of the client.
Four, reasons for selection
This case involves three core difficulties of divorce disputes: pre-marital property division, equity division of a large factory, and custody of children, and the client has special requests for a peaceful divorce. The legal team precisely balances mediation and litigation, professionally interpreting the legal rules of property division while also considering the emotional needs of both parties, achieving the goal of a peaceful separation and the realization of rights and interests through flexible mediation. This case not only reflects the team's professional ability to handle divorce disputes involving substantial property but also demonstrates a style of handling cases with a combination of firmness and gentleness, providing high-quality solutions for parties seeking a peaceful divorce.
Third, if the male party commits infidelity and gifts a large sum of money to the third party, can the legitimate spouse recover the funds?

One, Basic Case Situation
The principal and her husband registered their marriage in 2002, had three children after marriage, and jointly operated a company, with a relatively good emotional foundation between the couple. By the end of 2024, the principal accidentally discovered that her husband had been having an affair outside of marriage as early as 2014. During the affair, he had arbitrarily transferred money to the third party, purchased social security for the third party, and paid for the third party's children's school fees, with a total expenditure of over 1.3 million yuan. The principal believes that the amount is joint property of the couple, and her husband's act of arbitrarily gifting the money to the third party has infringed upon her legitimate rights and interests. Therefore, she has entrusted the Tao Hua Marriage and Family Law Firm's Tang Yunhong to handle the case, with the core demand being to recover all the gifted money.
Core keywords:Shenzhen professional divorce lawyer, affair-related bank transfers to the third party, invalid gift contract, improper relationship between men and women, protection of joint marital property
1. Whether there is an improper relationship between the male party and the third party;
2. Whether the over 1.3 million yuan gifted by the male party to the third party is joint property of the couple, and whether the gift is valid;
3. Whether the original spouse can require the third party to fully return the gifted funds.Chapter 3: Case Outcome
The Tang Yunhong legal team took over the case, fully collecting evidence of the man's improper relationship with the third party, bank transfer records, and related expense vouchers, clearly identifying that the over 1.3 million yuan was joint marital property. The man, without the consent of the principal, unilaterally gifted the joint property to the third party, and this act of gifting was based on an improper relationship between men and women, which violated public order and good customs, and should be deemed invalid. During the trial, the legal team fully presented evidence and made strong defenses. After hearing, the court determined that the man and the third party had an improper relationship between men and women, and the gift agreement between them was invalid. The court ordered the third party to return the gifted amount in full to the principal. The case was fully won, effectively safeguarding the joint property rights of the principal.
Four, reasons for selection
This case involves a dispute over the gift of joint marital property triggered by an extramarital affair, which is a frequent case in the field of marriage and family law. The core difficulty lies in the evidence of an improper relationship and the determination of the validity of the gift. The legal team accurately grasped the legal provisions on the joint disposal right of marital property, comprehensively collected evidence, effectively refuted the opponent's defense, and ultimately achieved the litigation goal of fully recovering the gifted funds, to the maximum extent protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the original spouse. The case demonstrates the team's litigation strength in marriage and family infringement disputes, provides a clear winning strategy for similar extramarital affair gift cases, and has strong reference value.
Four, how should pre-marital and post-marital housing properties be divided during a divorce? How should joint liabilities of the couple be identified?

One, Basic Case Situation
The principal and his wife were married for ten years, but later due to a breakdown in their relationship, both parties agreed to divorce and hoped to dissolve the marriage relationship peacefully through a written agreement. However, during the negotiation process, serious disagreements arose over issues such as the standard for the payment of child support, the division plan for pre-marital/post-marital property, and the handling of debts incurred from the principal's parents' investment in purchasing the house: the principal is worried that after the divorce, he will not be able to guarantee the education and quality of life of the children, and is unwilling to assume unreasonable debts; his wife hopes to obtain a larger share of the property and refuses to assume the loan from the principal's parents' investment. To properly resolve the dispute and smoothly handle the divorce procedures, the principal entrusted the Tang Yunhong lawyer team of Guangdong Daohua Law Firm to provide professional assistance.
Core keywords:Shenzhen's renowned divorce lawyer, divorce mediation, divorce property division, joint debt identification, custody and child support

1. The focus of the dispute: How to define the boundary for dividing pre-marital and post-marital housing properties during divorce, and how to reasonably divide them by considering factors such as investment and property registration;

2. Whether the debt incurred by the male parents for purchasing a house belongs to the joint debt of the couple, and whether it should be jointly borne by both parties or individually by the male party.III. Case Outcome
Tang Yunhong lawyer and his team took over, comprehensively sorted out the property and debt situations of both parties, interpreted the core rules of property division and debt recognition in accordance with relevant laws, balanced the claims of both parties, and mediated in the middle. Finally, with the assistance of the lawyer team, both parties reached a consensus, smoothly signed the "Divorce Agreement," clarified the methods of child support, the division plan for pre-marital/post-marital property, and the handling method for the debt funded by the husband's parents, smoothly handled the divorce procedures, effectively avoided possible performance disputes after divorce, and brought a perfect close to the peaceful end of this marriage.
IV. Selection Reasons
This case is a typical divorce agreement dispute, focusing on the two core issues of property division and the identification of joint debts, and also involves matters related to child support, with concentrated contradictions. The legal team takes peaceful mediation and conflict resolution as the core, accurately interprets legal rules, balances the legitimate rights and interests of both parties, assists in reaching a fair and reasonable divorce agreement, and avoids the confrontation and loss brought by litigation. This case reflects the team's mediation capabilities and precise control over the core legal issues of divorce disputes, providing an efficient and convenient solution for similar divorce agreement cases.
V. How to handle the property transfer of the judgment party's property under the name of the other party?

I. Basic Case Situation
The principal and his wife were married for over thirty years, but later, due to the breakdown of their marriage, the People's Court ruled in favor of their divorce. Both parties' family assets exceeded one billion yuan, and more than a dozen properties were awarded to the principal by the court. However, after the divorce, his wife refused to cooperate in handling the property transfer procedures, resulting in the principal being unable to legally enjoy the ownership of the properties and suffering damage to his rights and interests. To smoothly handle the property transfer and implement the court's judgment, the principal entrusted Tang Yunhong and Zhou Tien of the Guangdong Daohua Law Firm to handle the property transfer matters on his behalf.
Core Keywords:Divorce dispute, property transfer, Shenzhen female divorce lawyer, divorce property division, judgment enforcementII. Dispute Focus
In divorce cases, the People's Court has already ruled that the property should be owned by one party, but the other party refuses to cooperate in handling the transfer procedures. The prevailing party should take what legal measures to smoothly handle the property transfer and realize the rights determined by the judgment.
III. Case Outcome
Tang Yunhong and Zhou Dian's legal team took over, clearly defining the core process of enforcement, actively collecting relevant materials such as court judgments and effective proof, applying for assistance in enforcement to relevant departments in accordance with the law, following up on the transfer process throughout, coordinating and resolving various issues that arose during the transfer process, overcoming the resistance of the other party's non-cooperation, and ultimately successfully completing the transfer procedures for more than a dozen properties, ensuring that the court judgment was implemented, and effectively safeguarding the legitimate property rights and interests of the client.
IV. Selection ReasonsThis case focuses on the practical difficulty of executing the property transfer after the divorce judgment, breaking through the dilemma of being unable to realize the rights after winning the case. The lawyer team is familiar with the legal process of judgment enforcement and has strong execution coordination capabilities. They followed up on the property transfer matters throughout the process, effectively solving the core problem of the other party's non-cooperation, ensuring the smooth transfer of more than ten properties, and realizing the winning party's rights and interests. This case reflects the advantages of the team's one-stop marriage and family legal services, from litigation to enforcement, a closed-loop process, providing professional practical guidance for similar judgment enforcement cases.

Dao Hua Family Law Firm, specializing for ten years in major property-related family law services, is an expert in marriage, inheritance, and family disputes (mediation/trial), and one of the influential brands in [Shenzhen] for marriage, inheritance, and wealth management legal services. The team has handled over 1000 cases related to marriage and inheritance, and has extensive practical experience in mediation and litigation in major complex family law matters, inheritance disputes, will drafting, and family property distribution. The team is skilled in handling difficult divorce property division cases involving Shenzhen's small property rights houses, village committee shares, will drafting and notarization, and inheritance disputes, winning unanimous praise from clients.

Adhering to the philosophy of "securing asset safety, preventing legal risks, and empowering wealth growth," the firm assembles experts from the legal, banking, insurance, and tax industries, with a wealth of successful cases. It provides a comprehensive one-stop solution for high-net-worth individuals (including Hong Kong, Macau, and foreign nationals) for marriage, family, and wealth inheritance, to achieve the beautiful vision of risk prevention, debt isolation, and family wealth inheritance.

Asset types include: real estate (commercial housing, small property rights houses, land use rights, etc.), various property rights and interests (equities, debts, relocation compensation, copyrights, invention patents, etc.). The team has compiled "Dao Hua Successful Cases in Marriage and Inheritance" and "Legal Practice of Family Wealth Inheritance," achieving remarkable results in both legal practice and theoretical research.Statement:The information or articles published on this website are for exchange purposes only. The names of individuals or companies mentioned in this article are pseudonyms, and the amounts and dates of case information have been processed for confidentiality. The content of the article is created by the author and does not represent legal opinions or suggestions issued by Guangdong Daohua Law Firm or other lawyers. The information contained in this article is provided for general information purposes only, and Guangdong Daohua Law Firm does not make any timely modifications or updates to this article. Decisions made by readers based on all or part of the content of this article and the consequences arising therefrom are solely the responsibility of the individuals making the decisions. Neither the author nor Guangdong Daohua Law Firm assumes any responsibility. If any content of this article is to be reproduced or cited, please indicate the source. If you need legal advice or legal services, please contact our lawyers.